Ideas for Administration/Integrations as submitted to our Feature Upvote board. Ideas are ordered by 'new' and the 50 top matches are included. pr_d6b8qlx6lqhgdou 2025-05-18T12:19:04Z sug_q05xxyis9ci7muv 2026-06-01T15:32:13Z 2026-06-11T18:04:44Z Like I was able to do in PI 1, I would like to be able to sort pending PI assessments by date sent for in Hire and in Inspire. sug_txen88qujwdkzdx 2026-06-02T14:51:24Z 2026-06-03T13:55:16Z We have run in to a very time consuming issue where we are limited to a max upload of 400 new users during an org upload. We also got many error messages due to us having to separate our data in to four uploads as an employee and their manager may not be on the same CSV upload so we consistently receive error messages that the managers did not exist. We would then have to remove those individuals and do more uploads. For an org upload there should be no limits on number of employees added and no requirements for the manager to already be in the system. We spent almost 4 hours trying to add 1700 employees and send invites to take the assessment. sug_pkai8ncrwm0xdoa 2026-02-21T15:01:31Z 2026-05-12T13:33:29Z When a user is added to PI that was linked to another account or to a demo account, the user doesn't receive the invitations to the new account. Cleaning up the error messaging on creation vs finding out from the client would be a minimum viable solution. Other approaches could be: • One thing I have seen work well in the past is a notification at the time of creation…this could allow a user or partner to confirm the user is indeed under their instance. That would allow the process to continue… • the other way this could be resolved is if a domain is added to an instance, that would allow users in a trail to be released….my assumption (which is dangerous I know) is that in a case of an acquisition you have a method to migrate data in a more formal way so it would make sense that registering a domain would allow the release of those – and for any public domains (gmail.com, etc) it could just ignore them or something. sug_eirizui3bgewtpr 2026-03-02T17:03:22Z 2026-05-12T13:28:47Z When looking for a people PI, I can find one person at the time with the search bar (that's good), but if I need to download a report with more than one person, I need to go page by page looking for the specific people to add. There should be a way to look for somebody, mark that person, and search again but keeping the people you already selected. sug_ycer37jigsjxwie 2026-04-10T13:54:21Z 2026-05-12T13:28:34Z I'm referring only to the PI2 HRIS "PI Software Add-on" Integrations - found here https://predictiveindex.my.site.com/partners/s/account/0013100001lEmRPAA0/upt-frtl When these are implemented, the HRIS system is the system of recrod, as it should be. Then First Name becomes the first name in the PI Software - so many people don't go by thier legal first name. Most HRIS systems have a Preferred Name field to cover this, it defaults to the First Name unless changed. It would be so AMAZING to have that in PI2. Integration is very helpful in NDR. This makes it frustrating, we have a couple of clients that I don't think anyone goes by their legal first name. Please help! sug_yqqg6gvk3545atf 2026-04-10T16:13:12Z 2026-05-12T13:18:36Z It would be incredibly helpful to be able to sort/filter by job title when trying to grant access in bulk on the Employee Access Settings screen. It would also save a lot of time if there were options to grant access for cognitive, creating jobs, and sending assessments to co-workers. sug_iiahpjjtwkyidpv 2026-04-14T06:28:15Z 2026-05-12T13:18:29Z We would like to be able to build an integration between our HR system and Connect it to the employee status in PI. When an employee is leaving our company and we have added a termination date in the HR system, we would like this to trigger a status change in PI from employee to candidate so that the profile is automatically deleted. Alternative an integration that deletes the profile in PI based on the termination date. sug_s0cfnucptyge440 2026-04-17T17:43:48Z 2026-05-12T13:18:12Z We are working to increase the usage and adoption of PI tools in our hiring process; however, given the lack of reporting functionality, it is very difficult to track our progress. As an admin on the account, I should be able to download reports of user activity to see how many assessments each user is sending; however, the current setup requires that I reach out to our vendor for this data. Also, it would be helpful to see how many assessment invitations result in a completed assessment. Additionally, we would like improved reporting capabilities to track usage generated per assessment link or by folder group. This would help us identify groups within our business that are using the tools versus areas where more support is needed. It would also be helpful to have reporting on job assessments created - including a breakdown of candidates tagged to the job. This would help us track the conversion and success rate of candidates based on their PI match to the role. Overall, we would just like to have greater reporting capability as account administrators. sug_erfrfcx8fflaekm 2026-04-23T19:19:42Z 2026-05-12T13:15:17Z rather than clicking through a calendar. sug_1sethjy02ugdulz 2026-04-28T15:02:59Z 2026-05-12T13:14:31Z Client is asking for an integration with Trakstar sug_dhn2oy5trrdoxyx 2026-05-06T20:34:13Z 2026-05-12T13:14:24Z Currently, the widget on the dashboard to send the assessment link to employees does not follow the same settings as in Inspire. The Dashboard widget automatically sends the employee their Behavioral results regardless of the assessment link settings being set to no email notification/results upon completion. It does not make sense to me that the shortcut/widget on the dashboard would behave differently from the settings we have set for our organization. It would be extremely helpful if the dashboard and other assessment links would behave the same way and have their settings connected. At the very least, having an option/checkbox, like in the Inspire module, on the dashboard is necessary. sug_mfqaukiwdgibzro 2026-02-25T23:57:22Z 2026-03-31T13:35:57Z The current Download CSV button label and behavior are misaligned with how clients expect exports to work. Clients are selecting specific employees, clicking Download CSV, and receiving the full directory export instead. The curated export is available, but it is hidden in the dropdown menu and not discoverable in the moment. Why it matters: This creates a “selection implies export” expectation gap. From the client’s perspective, the product is ignoring their selections, which reads like a bug, even if it is technically functioning as designed. Recommendations: 1. Update functionality (preferred): If users have selected employees, Download CSV should export only the selected employees. If nothing is selected, it should export the full directory. 2. Or update labeling + UI cues: Keep current functionality, but relabel and clarify: - Button label: Download full directory CSV - Dropdown option: Download selected employees CSV sug_xkgu5zsnlbo0gsj 2026-02-27T17:43:56Z 2026-03-31T13:35:31Z When PI is integrated with an HRIS and job changes are processed in the HRIS, the PI system should not only update the job title but also reassign the employee to the associated job/job target. sug_oai1voetncxfwut 2026-03-09T18:03:40Z 2026-03-31T13:34:20Z Cognitive Assessment access only shows if the person has Cognitive Admin access. It does NOT show Employee Access Settings with Cognitive Access who are not Admins. See the screenshot for a client example: Gail Owen has Cognitive Access, but the Employee Access Settings list does not provide visibility. How are clients supposed to know who has access without having to click into an individual's profile? sug_57yqy2oonbdu3dh 2026-03-12T15:47:00Z 2026-03-31T13:34:10Z There is no ability within the platform to export the list of Pending Invitations. It would be helpful to be able to export a list of users with pending invitations as we can with other aspects of administering users (Ex: Actions > Download CSV) The need is to identify which users have completed the assessment, but not invited to the platform, to avoid inundating them with invitations to the platform. Alternatively, adding these as filter options from Employee Access Settings could also be helpful sug_7nuspqhlg7phsjj 2026-03-19T14:16:21Z 2026-03-31T13:33:59Z In addition to Department and Location employee fields, we also have Business Units at our company, so a Business Unit or Division filed would be most helpful since Location doesn't always correlate with Business Unit/Division at our company. sug_x56zlauqmkqive6 2026-03-27T16:05:25Z 2026-03-27T16:05:40Z Can we add a message to the homepage that explains what to do if users don't have an account yet? For example, all employees received the "create an account" email when we moved to the new platform (new hires also receive this). However, if they miss that email or don't complete it and try to access PI 2.0 later on, it creates a confusing experience because this really isn't a true SSO experience. sug_3evf4drasduospz 2026-03-06T16:38:21Z 2026-03-23T17:53:43Z Currently, we only support SP-initiated SSO. Our beta SSO clients have been asking to support idp initiated SSO as well. Clients want their employees to be able to log in to their IDP dashboard (e.g., Okta), see a "Predictive Index" tile, click it, and be magically logged into PI without any extra steps. To do this, they'd need a specific web address they plug into their idP dashboard (e.g. Okta) to make that seamless jump happen. sug_lmt3j648iovzzbm 2026-01-28T18:51:49Z 2026-02-11T19:08:12Z What better way to get clients to become dependent on PI?! Right now if they don't have PERFORM (less than 10% of all PI clients!!!) they can't use SLACK. This is a huge opportunity loss for PI and partners to ensure continued use of the pi tools. sug_70vnfybkp8estzk 2025-11-04T15:46:53Z 2026-02-11T19:04:51Z Can you please add an endpoint that provides a download URL for the assessment reports/PDFs. sug_jszjagm0tb93tjt 2025-11-12T17:34:27Z 2026-02-11T19:04:07Z When clients migrate to PI2, the original creator of each Job Target remains listed as the owner, even if that individual no longer has access to the platform. This has surfaced a need for a bulk update feature to manage Job Target ownership. Currently, PI2 maintains the original Job Target creator as the owner and automatically directs the Assessment Completion email to that person. For clients with hundreds of Job Targets, manually opening and editing each one to change ownership and update notification settings is an inefficient and time-consuming process. Additionally, beyond migration scenarios, this challenge persists whenever a team member leaves the organization. Users need an easier way to reassign Job Target ownership and adjust notifications in bulk to ensure continuity and proper communication across the platform. sug_ow4im364a758hnj 2025-10-02T07:33:13Z 2026-02-11T18:46:47Z In order to conduct an effective analysis of current employees who complete the assessment, we need to know their job title. Can we have a feature to do a mass upload sug_osw5qrgfubtwrop 2026-02-11T17:18:38Z 2026-02-11T17:26:12Z When a person loses access to PI2, their name should be displayed at the Share area and have an Admin be able to transfer ownership to themselves or another person. sug_awqnpbop7s28l86 2025-07-30T12:58:25Z 2026-02-06T20:43:44Z We currently display an overview of Org Admin and Org Admin/Cog Admin permission status in the Employee Directory and Employee Access Settings page. Those with Org Admin/Cog Admin permissions are shown as a filled in checkbox with a checkmark and those without these permissions show as an empty box. While these boxes are 'greyed' out indicating changes cannot be made from the Employee Directory/Employee Access Settings, the way it is currently displayed in the software makes it seem like Org Admins/Cog Admins are able to grant and enable users these permissions directly from the Employee Directory, instead of within the user's record. Some suggestions would be to replace the empty boxes with dashes if the user does not have these permissions or making the checked boxes like checkmarks so they appear more like a status overview and removing empty boxes, instead of a place where an Org Admin can make changes. sug_0lgdrjkvpcxseof 2025-08-26T18:35:20Z 2026-02-06T20:43:27Z Currently, users can only search for employees in their Employee Directory by name. Whereas, employees can be searched by both name and email under the the Employee Access Settings. Suggesting the ability to search for employees by name and email address in the Employee Directory. sug_rvjibnq4klsojni 2025-11-04T16:55:45Z 2026-02-06T20:41:25Z Add feature in the Admin page that will allow you to upload a csv file of previously completed PI assessments of employees and candidates with BSIDs. I have a client that was at one point retired and has a csv file of all previous PI data. They now have an active account and want to add all previous 2000+ assessments. There is no bulk option to upload score IDs. Currently, the only option is to enter score Ids one-by-one into their software. sug_rhs8jk73f3erjjb 2025-11-17T13:06:08Z 2026-02-06T20:39:42Z It would be very helpful to know who has created a user in an account. In big accounts with more account owners and admins, it would be good to know who to reach out to when a user has been registered with a wrong folder access or does not have access to cognitive data. sug_byvigijiunvnssl 2025-12-01T13:41:21Z 2026-02-06T20:34:56Z In the Hiring Center it under the candidates tab it defaults to 10 results per page, while clicking in and out of individuals it always resets back to 10 results per page. Can the option to leave it as 100 or 50 per page be added, Scrolling down is easier/faster than having to wait for "next page"? sug_olu8haki1k4nx93 2026-01-09T14:34:37Z 2026-02-06T20:34:18Z In the employee directory, a purple banner appears above stating: “Software access is required to edit user permissions. Please invite this user to the software.” This can be confusing for non–org admin users who do not have the “Edit Employee Details” permission. When they attempt to edit an employee’s name or email, they see greyed-out fields and this banner, which implies software access is required for the action they’re attempting. While the message is technically correct for editing permissions, software access is not required to edit employee details. My question/request is whether this messaging could better reflect what’s actually happening: Should the banner appear preemptively when the block is permission-based rather than software-access–based? Could it appear only after a user attempts to edit permissions without software access? For users lacking the Edit Employee Details permission, could a clearer message be shown (e.g indicating they don’t have permission to edit) sug_zkbbfnaeogylgep 2026-01-30T20:28:44Z 2026-02-06T20:30:42Z Allow the option to select NO ACCESS under Bulk Actions in the Administration section of PI. Right now, only Limited and Admin role security is allowed to be selected. Use case: We have a need to change access for a number of employees and am wondering why when using the bulk actions in the Employee Access Settings, under the options for Design (Change Design Access) , it does not allow you the ability to give NO ACCESS? The only options are LIMITED and ADMIN. However, I have about 15-20 users that are set up with LIMITED access to DESIGN and they should NO ACCESS. To manually change this many staff take a very long time as you need to open up each employee individually and click NO ACCESS and SAVE (which takes like 15-30 seconds to save) and when you exit that screen you have to sort and filter the employee listing to get to the next person. sug_pgotglh5ctf8ewb 2026-02-05T18:50:03Z 2026-02-06T20:29:15Z Our current integration from Workday to the Legacy platform utilizes the persons/EmailBAReports API call to distribute the assessment results to a varying group of interested parties based on the job requisition (Hiring manager, HR partner, etc.). We want to continue to use this functionality so please consider updating the PI2 platform to include this API. sug_on78sckcsmoq3ld 2026-01-28T10:50:24Z 2026-03-04T17:48:40Z Many global clients use the same PI Software for different locations. It's vital for data protection reasons that the access can be limited so that users from a specific location can only see the data relating to that location. sug_jfkri30j72otxel 2023-06-15T20:46:33Z 2025-12-30T19:06:46Z Please add Burmese as a language to take the behavioral assessment in for our employees from Myanmar. sug_gf6jjzdysx2hkr1 2024-01-16T16:00:38Z 2025-12-30T19:05:47Z Original: Please read the words in the list below and check those that you feel describe the way you are expected to act by others at work. Current German translation: Bitte lies die unten angeführten Wörter und kreuze diejenigen an, von denen du meinst, dass sie dein Verhalten so beschreiben, wie es von dir von anderen Personen am Arbeitsplatz erwartet wird. recommended translation: Bitte lies die unten angeführten Wörter und kreuze diejenigen an, die das Verhalten am Arbeitsplatz beschreiben, das andere Personen von dir erwarten. sug_ysteu0cgctfrqcb 2025-01-10T16:40:28Z 2025-12-30T19:04:10Z Right now, the only report that can be produced in Spanish for the US version is the Behavioral Report. I have several clients as well as a prospect that have a lot of native Spanish speakers who need access to reports such as the Interview Guide, Relationship Guide, Personal Development, Job Report, etc. It is holding up client upgrades in South Florida as well as Texas and Southern California. sug_pi5mulab4hxcu5y 2023-04-28T14:20:37Z 2025-12-30T19:02:33Z Telugu & Marathi languages are widely used all over India. As our native language we would require these languages to be added in the native language list for the test takers to use. sug_3cf8sviqpdbtq8a 2024-08-14T15:32:51Z 2025-12-30T19:01:28Z We have the potential for a large international client expansion but, only if Japanese is added. sug_t9opbja0soirxs6 2023-04-27T15:26:51Z 2025-12-30T19:00:35Z Kyrgyzstan is the country; western China and north of Afghanistan. International client request. sug_ekhaffn3l2ih8zx 2024-01-12T08:01:12Z 2025-12-30T18:59:06Z Reference Profile Icons with names in Spanish sug_tohangglwb5b3qc 2023-06-20T15:09:08Z 2025-12-30T18:58:24Z If you complete a BA in any other language than English, you are requested to choose gender. We already have a note explaining that language choice will not be reflected in the results - please add a similar note for gender choice. sug_1hnkwnahcgtv9es 2023-02-01T15:09:08Z 2025-12-30T18:57:42Z Currently, only the English behavioral report is gender neutral. More and more clients are asking for the option of creating gender neutral reports in the other report languages. I know the grammer is more complex in some languages, but it should be doable, at least as an option if not the default. sug_6vscudq3wigwqlu 2025-10-28T16:02:09Z 2025-11-03T15:29:20Z We need a feature that allows clients to bulk-activate the most recent assessment for a selected group of employees. Specifically, clients should be able to: Select multiple (or all) employees. Execute a single action to set each selected employee's most recent completed assessment as their 'Active' assessment. sug_gjs7k7wghsrapbc 2025-10-22T16:23:02Z 2025-10-28T13:02:52Z Some international clients and prospects require their data to be stored in their country. This is often paired with access restrictions to PI's US employees. sug_sjvomuyod1vauks 2025-10-03T23:27:16Z 2025-10-28T12:46:34Z Instructions need to be more comprehensive: Current text: "Their product access and email address cannot be edited until they create their software account." Recommended revision to be clear, especially when trying to correct a name typo or anything else within the employee details: "The employee's information cannot be edited while an invitation is pending. To make changes, either wait for them to create their account, or revoke the invitation, update their details, and resend it." sug_ajmoykcxu8izmf2 2025-10-01T18:00:02Z 2025-10-28T12:54:59Z Thank you for adding the "select all" box in the Employee Directory area- however, it only allows you to select all on one page. We need it to allow you to select all employees at once so we can download a file that shows all users we have in the system. Additionally, the columns that come out in that report, do not include all of the columns in the Employee Directory (see attached) and it has Artisans listed as Craftsmen in the report. sug_tfmwozn88hhduwq 2025-10-01T00:07:32Z 2025-10-01T17:42:00Z Right now does not seem a way to download a full list of employees into CSV file. Have to select them individually need a box to select all to download. sug_ghnwbqlivqzkfiv 2025-09-26T20:56:02Z 2025-10-01T17:33:14Z I would love to see an option where we can add a BSID to the system regardless of the module the client has purchased. sug_dlr4m7jzkiuuiyq 2025-09-18T21:11:04Z 2025-10-28T12:50:58Z This is especially important for converted clients. Many of my clients have candidates that are not tied to Jobs as they are being considered for multiple roles. They can be accessed in Legacy. In PI2, however, they do not come up in search unless they are tied to a Job. It makes it seems like they did not get converted. Please allow candidates not attached to a job to come up in Global Search. This is a client request. sug_ryew2qvtzmh77p3 2025-09-16T08:33:09Z 2025-09-17T17:55:22Z When integrating PI with an ATS, it often happens that multiple assessments are sent to the same person due to triggers in the job flow etc. This is really annoying and can be avoided if PI were to introduce indempotence, e.g. First request: Create invitation for candidate #123, job #456, test: PI Behavioral → Invitation created, ID = 789. Second request (retry with same key): System sees it’s the same candidate, job, and test. → Instead of creating a new invitation, system returns: 200 OK – existing invitation ID = 789. Result: candidate only ever gets one invitation, even if ATS sends the request multiple times. sug_rultr53rssbin1u 2025-09-11T18:34:49Z 2025-09-24T17:33:50Z For annual review purposes, it would be helpful to assign multiple managers to staff in the org chart. This is helpful for our leadership team who are evaluated by more than one person.